This qualitative study found that physicians express negative and positive attitudes toward patients when documenting in the medical record. Although often not explicit, this language could potentially transmit bias and affect the quality of care that patients subsequently receive. These findings suggest that increased physician awareness when writing and reading medical records is needed to prevent the perpetuation of negative bias in medical care.
Patient Experience
Knowledge, power, and patients: The ethics of open notes
But do patients really need access to their health information, or should electronic health records be the sole preserve of physicians? We explore this question using our own case studies.
Open Notes Become Law: A Challenge for Mental Health Practice
Although benefits to patients’ having access to psychiatric notes have been documented, early studies involved patients’ access to hard copies they often reviewed in the presence of mental health professionals. … Clinicians worry about possible harms, and in surveys, many psychiatrists anticipate that patients will become confused, get angry, or decompensate when reading their notes. However, experience challenges the assumption that mental health notes should remain segregated because these patients “cannot handle it.” … Both anecdotally and in surveys, fears among clinicians have largely been unrealized, and we are not aware of any reports of harm to or legal action from patients accessing their mental health notes.
Preparing Patients and Clinicians for Open Notes in Mental Health: Qualitative Inquiry of International Experts
This study provides timely information on policy and training recommendations derived from a wide range of international experts on how to prepare clinicians and patients for open notes in mental health. The results of this study point to the need for further refinement of exemption policies in relation to sharing mental health notes, guidance for patients, and curricular changes for students and clinicians as well as improvements aimed at enhancing patient and clinician-friendly portal design.
How Sharing Clinical Notes Affects the Patient-Physician Relationship
Tom Delbanco, MD, will never forget his “aha!” moment, even though it was nearly 50 years ago.
The patient sitting across from him had been referred to Delbanco for evaluation of hypertension. But Delbanco thought the man’s symptoms suggested he consumed more alcohol than he’d acknowledged.
Delbanco considered adding alcohol misuse to the patient’s “problems list,” but he stopped writing after realizing that the patient, a printer who set type by hand, was reading his notes upside down. Delbanco explained why he had stopped writing and informed the patient that he suspected he drank more than 2 beers a day. If that was the case, Delbanco added, it should be noted on his chart.
The Value of OpenNotes for Pediatric Patients, Their Families and Impact on the Patient–Physician Relationship
Although limited by relatively low survey response rate, OpenNotes was well-received by parents of pediatric patients without untoward consequences. The main concerns pediatricians raise about OpenNotes proved to not be issues in the pediatric population. Our results demonstrate clear benefits to adoption of OpenNotes. This provides reassurance that the transition to sharing notes with pediatric patients can be successful and value additive.
Words Matter: What Do Patients Find Judgmental or Offensive in Outpatient Notes?
One in 10 respondents reported feeling judged/offended by something they read in an outpatient note due to the perception that it contained errors, surprises, labeling, or evidence of disrespect. The content and tone may be particularly important to patients in poor health. Enhanced clinician awareness of the patient perspective may promote an improved medical lexicon, reduce the transmission of bias to other clinicians, and reinforce healing relationships.
Validation of a brief scale to assess ambulatory patients’ perceptions of reading visit notes: a scale development study
Four studies were used to evaluate the construct validity of a benefits and risks scale. Study 1 refined the items; study 2 evaluated underlying factor structure and identified the items; study 3 evaluated study 2 results in a separate sample; and study 4 examined factorial invariance of the developed scale across educational subsamples.
The findings suggest that the four-item benefits scale has excellent construct validity and preliminary evidence of generalising across different patient populations. Further scale development is needed to understand perceived risks of reading open notes.
Open Notes in Oncology: Patient versus Oncology Clinician Views
Most oncology clinician views about open notes differ from those of patients. For example, 70% percent of clinicians agreed that open notes are a “good idea,” while 98% of patients endorsed this view. Further, 44% of oncology clinicians believed cancer patients would be confused by notes; just 4% of patients reported feeling confused after reading. Patient and clinician views about open notes in oncology are not aligned, with patients expressing considerably more enthusiasm.
Six countries, six individuals: resourceful patients navigating medical records in Australia, Canada, Chile, Japan, Sweden and the USA
In the absence of international standards, widely differing attitudes and laws, medical and social cultures strongly influence whether and how patients may access their medical records in various settings of care. Reviewing records, including the notes clinicians write, can help shape how people participate in their own care. Aided at times by new technologies, individual patients and care partners are repurposing existing tools and designing innovative, often ‘low-tech’ ways to collect, sort and interpret their own health information. To illustrate diverse approaches that individuals may take, six individuals from six nations offer anecdotes demonstrating how they are learning to collect, assess and benefit from their personal health information.
Except where otherwise noted, the content by OpenNotes is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
