OpenNotes faculty and scholars conduct research and collaborate with investigators around the world to understand the effects of fully transparent medical care on communication, engagement, safety, costs, and the overall quality of care. Below you can review work conducted by OpenNotes faculty and scholars, often joined by colleagues from a wide variety of settings in the US and beyond.
Want to join OpenNotes research efforts?
Send us a message.
Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Patients’ Perceptions of the Patient Portal Experience with OpenNotes
This article analyzes patients’ perceptions about the patient portal experience with access to primary care and specialist’s notes and evaluates free-text comments as an improvement opportunity.
In this issue, an American College of Physicians (ACP) position paper on Principles for Patient and Family Partnership in Care moves beyond longstanding rhetoric urging clinicians to become more “patient-centered” and calls for an aggressive turn toward true partnership (1).
This study evaluates whether a web-based educational program for patients who read their mental health notes online improves patient-clinician communication and increases patient activation.
OpenNotes and shared decision making: a growing practice in clinical transparency and how it can support patient-centered care
Prior studies suggest inviting patients to read their visit notes (OpenNotes) has important benefits for patient engagement. We utilized survey data to investigate our hypothesis that patients who read more notes would report greater shared decision making (SDM).
The Importance of Visit Notes on Patient Portals for Engaging Less Educated or Nonwhite Patients: Survey Study.
Background: OpenNotes, a national initiative to share clinicians’ visit notes with patients, can improve patient engagement, but effects on vulnerable populations are not known very well.
Objective: Our aim is to examine the importance of visit notes to nonwhite and less educated patients.
Who Reads Their Doctor’s Notes? Examining the Association between Preconceptions and Accessing Online Clinical Notes
Patients who use online portals to review their clinicians’ notes may become more actively involved in their healthcare, but the healthcare industry knows little about factors that may facilitate or inhibit patients’ use of this new practice.
Abstract: There are concerns regarding whether patients with mental illness should be provided with access to their electronic medical records. This study compared perceptions of patients with (n = 400) and without (n = 2,134) a mental health diagnosis regarding access to primary care clinic notes through secure online portals. Eligible participants viewed at least…
Tackling Ambulatory Safety Risks Through Patient Engagement: What 10,000 Patients and Families Say About Safety-Related Knowledge, Behaviors, and Attitudes After Reading Visit Notes
Background: Ambulatory safety risks including delayed diagnoses or missed abnormal test results are difficult for clinicians to see, because they often occur in the space between visits. Experts advocate greater patient engagement to improve safety, but strategies are limited. Patient access to clinical notes (“OpenNotes”) may help close the safety gap between visits. Methods: We…
Sharing clinic notes online with patients and parents may yield many potential benefits to patients and providers alike, but the unprecedented transparency and accessibility to notes afforded by patient portals has also raised a number of unique ethical and legal concerns. As the movement toward transparent notes (OpenNotes) grows, clinicians and health care organizations caring…
Patients frequently depend on informal caregivers (e.g., family, friends, or paid workers) to assist with various aspects of medical care, such as medication administration and travel to medical appointments. OpenNotes seeks to share clinicians’ notes with patients through patient portals. Although patients frequently grant portal access to caregivers, the impact of this improved access to…